Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JANUARY 2026

No Forced Possession In Delayed Projects: REAT Jaipur Clarifies Scope Of Refund Rights

The Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur ("REAT"), in Satish Sharma v. VVA Developers Pvt. Ltd.1, has delivered a significant ruling clarifying the scope of an allottee's right to refund under the Real Estate...

IndiaReal Estate and Construction

Introduction

The Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur ("REAT"), in Satish Sharma v. VVA Developers Pvt. Ltd.1, has delivered a significant ruling clarifying the scope of an allottee's right to refund under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 ("RERA Act"). The decision of REAT Jaipur reiterates that project delay, non-execution of the Agreement for Sale, and arbitrary substitution of units decisively tilt the balance in favour of the allottee, even where partial completion certificates have been obtained by the promoter. This judgment is particularly relevant for homebuyers caught in long-delayed projects and for promoters seeking to rely on partial completion or alternative possession offers to defeat refund claims.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from