In its recent judgement dated March 17, 2020, in the matter of
Council of Architects v. Mukesh Goyal &
Ors.1, the Supreme Court held that the Architects
Act, 1972 ('Act') does not prohibit individuals not
registered under it from engaging in the practice of architecture
or functions allied thereto. This article dissects the history of
this provision and its interpretation, and makes suitable
comparisons to better quantify the outcome of the aforesaid
judgement.
Legislative Framework:
At the outset, it ought to be noted that the Statement of
Objects and Reasons of the Act cannot be inferred to be of a
prohibitory nature. The Statement of Objects and Reasons says that
"The legislation protects the title of
'architects', but does not make the design, supervision and
construction of buildings as an exclusive responsibility of
architects. Other professionals like engineers will be free to
engage themselves in their normal vocation in respect of building
construction