Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JULY 2020

Architects – From A Legal Perspective

Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India
Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India
Contributor
Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India

Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India

Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India is a full-service top-tier firm. The firm is a pioneer in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India

In its recent judgement dated March 17, 2020, in the matter of Council of Architects v. Mukesh Goyal & Ors. , the Supreme Court held that the Architects Act, 1972 (‘Act') does not prohibit individuals not registered.

IndiaReal Estate and Construction

In its recent judgement dated March 17, 2020, in the matter of Council of Architects v. Mukesh Goyal & Ors.1, the Supreme Court held that the Architects Act, 1972 ('Act') does not prohibit individuals not registered under it from engaging in the practice of architecture or functions allied thereto. This article dissects the history of this provision and its interpretation, and makes suitable comparisons to better quantify the outcome of the aforesaid judgement.

Legislative Framework:

At the outset, it ought to be noted that the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Act cannot be inferred to be of a prohibitory nature. The Statement of Objects and Reasons says that "The legislation protects the title of 'architects', but does not make the design, supervision and construction of buildings as an exclusive responsibility of architects. Other professionals like engineers will be free to engage themselves in their normal vocation in respect of building construction

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from