Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 APRIL 2021

Timelines For Deciding Jurisdictional Objections Under §16 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996: Surender Kumar Singhal V Arun Kumar Bhalotia

Tuli & Co
Tuli & Co
Contributor
Tuli & Co

Tuli & Co

About us: Tuli & Co was established in 2000 to service the Indian and international insurance and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Tuli & Co

§16 of the Act provides that a Tribunal is empowered to decide questions relating to its own jurisdiction. §16(5) of the Act provides that a Tribunal "shall decide on a plea" regarding its...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Timelines For Deciding Jurisdictional Objections Under §16 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996: Surender Kumar Singhal V Arun Kumar Bhalotia1

§16 of the Act provides that a Tribunal is empowered to decide questions relating to its own jurisdiction. §16(5) of the Act provides that a Tribunal "shall decide on a plea" regarding its jurisdiction, but does not say when jurisdictional objections have to be decided, and the timing issue has recently been clarified by the Delhi High Court.

The Conundrum

The Supreme Court had held that jurisdictional questions have to be decided "as a preliminary ground"2 and "in the first instance"3. Various High Courts4 have interpreted this to mean that a jurisdictional question can be decided after the evidence stage but before the final award is pronounced.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from