On 8 March 2021, the Supreme Court issued its final order. It said that the extension had served its purpose and should come to an end

Following shortly after the issuance of the Insurance Companies (Foreign Investment) Rules 2015 (Rules) on February 19 2015, ..

The Delhi High Court has held that an order passed by an arbitral tribunal pursuant to the matter being remitted back to it cannot be treated as a fresh arbitral award...

Aptec entered into a contract with the Ministry of Defence for the supply of mountaineering boots for the defence forces. The Ministry received the goods and after inspecting them, it made a payment on account to Aptec.

The Delhi High Court has held that pre-institution mediation under §12A of the Commercial Courts Act 2015 is mandatory for counterclaims, just as it is for an original suit.

Following our report last month of the Supreme Court decision in Genus Power, we now report a further welcome judgment on the sanctity of discharge vouchers/settlement agreements.

In March 2020, the Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of the prejudicial impact of the Covid-19 restrictions on compliance with limitation periods, and this led to Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No 3 of 2020.

To sum up, the Press Note appears to be another step by the law makers in the direction of creating a level playing field for sellers on on-line market places.

Loss adjusters, or "surveyors" as they are known in the Indian market, are the subject of the latest Circular issued by the Indian insurance industry regulator, the Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority (IRDA).

In March 2020, the Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of the impact of the Covid-19 restrictions on compliance with limitation periods, and this led to Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No 3 of 2020.

A Division Bench of the Madras High Court has set out the duties of a Single Judge considering the validity of an unreasoned arbitral award following a challenge to the award under §34 of the...

The Supreme Court of India has confirmed that the consumer fora has the power under the Consumer Protection Act 1986 to set aside one-sided terms in contracts...

Under §23 of the Act, the Central and State Governments are both empowered to monitor the implementation of the Act.

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has recently issued draft rules for the acceptance of deposits by companies.

The Telangana High Court has held that the enforcement of an arbitral award should be as per §42 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, which provides that when any application is made before a court...

Noting the difficulties that can be faced in enforcing judgments, the Supreme Court has issued directions for enforcement proceedings to be expedited.

The Calcutta High Court held that the Court is empowered to extend an arbitrator's mandate even if the application for an extension under §29A of the Arbitration Act 1996 is filed after the arbitrator's mandate has expired.

Seeking a refund for cancellation of a flight for personal travel? The Delhi High Court says that commercial courts are not the right forum.

On 23 March 2020, the Supreme Court of India extended the limitation period for all 'proceedings' with effect from 15 March 2020 until further orders.

A Full Bench of the Kerala High Court has said that Indian litigants can serve judicial proceedings on foreign defendants by post, thereby easing the process of cross border litigation.