Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MARCH 2022

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Purpose, Parameters And Problems Of Section 29A

Based on the 176th Law Commission Report, dated August 4, 2005, the Arbitration and Conciliation Bill, 2003, was laid on the table of both the Houses of the Parliament.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

"The penalty for exceeding the time limit is the forfeiture of the game." – Howard Staunton.

i. Introduction

The proposal to have a time limit for pronouncing an Arbitral Award has its origins in the 176th Law Commission Report dated September 12, 2001, wherein it was proposed that there should be a specified time period for completing arbitral proceedings.

Based on the 176th Law Commission Report, dated August 4, 2005, the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2003, was laid on the table of both the Houses of the Parliament.

However, in 2005, the mandatory time limit was not incorporated as the legislative wisdom was that such mandatory time limits may not yield positive results.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from