Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 FEBRUARY 2022

Pros And Cons Of Foreign Seated Arbitration

Kachwaha & Partners
Kachwaha & Partners
Contributor
Kachwaha & Partners

Kachwaha & Partners

Founded in 2002, Kachwaha & Partners is a multi-discipline, full service law firm with its main...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kachwaha & Partners

With Indian parties now able to arbitrate outside India, Sumeet Kachwaha and Tara Shahani look at the advantages and disadvantages, as well as how some parties may lose out by taking the dispute offshore.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

With Indian parties now able to arbitrate outside India, Sumeet Kachwaha and Tara Shahani look at the advantages and disadvantages, as well as how some parties may lose out by taking the dispute offshore.

In cross-border disputes, a neutral venue with a strong arbitral institute and a thriving arbitration community is generally agreed upon as the seat, and there are no doubt advantages in doing so. Like most issues, however, there is more than one side to the discussion.

Leading arbitral institutes administer arbitrations globally, not locally, and arbitrators usually belong to diverse jurisdictions, and are not tied down to any particular place. To illustrate, statistics from the International Court of Arbitration disclose that, in 2019, it administered arbitrations in 116 seats spread over 62 jurisdictions, with the arbitrators hailing from 69 jurisdictions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from