Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2024

No Confiscation Even If Classification Or Exemption Is Not In Conformity With The Department's View Or Held Not Correct In Appellate Proceedings

Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan
Contributor
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan

Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan

Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan (LKS) is a premier full-service Indian law firm specializing in areas...

View firm profile
Explore more from Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan

The CESTAT New Delhi has held that classification of goods by the importer, even if the same is not in conformity with re-assessment by the proper officer or even if it is held to be not correct...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys
Author LinkedIn connections

The CESTAT New Delhi has held that classification of goods by the importer, even if the same is not in conformity with re-assessment by the proper officer or even if it is held to be not correct in any appellate proceedings, does not render goods liable to confiscation under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962.

The Tribunal in this regard was of the view that it would lead to absurd results if Section 111(m) is read to mean that goods can be confiscated if classification of the goods and the exemption notification claimed by the importer self-assessing the duty under Section 17 do not match with what the proper officer may apply after re-assessment or later.

It noted that the importer self-assessing the goods must apply his mind when classifying the goods and not predict the mind of the proper officer.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from