Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 NOVEMBER 2025

Newsletter For October 2025- Arbitration

Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Contributor
Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal is a leading full-service Indian law firm, founded in 2008, providing comprehensive...

View firm profile
Explore more from Phoenix Legal

The Appellant i.e., Offshore Infrastructures Limited is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Mulund (West), Mumbai.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Author LinkedIn connections

ARBITRATION

Date: 07 October 2025

Case Name: Offshore Infrastructures Limited v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Civil Appeal of 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 22105-22106 of 2024)

Forum: Supreme Court

The Appellant i.e., Offshore Infrastructures Limited is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Mulund (West), Mumbai. The Respondent, originally Bharat Oman Refineries Limited, stood merged with M/s Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited with effect from 01 July 2022 and has its registered office at Bharat Bhavan, Ballard Estate, Mumbai.

The dispute arises out of a contract awarded by the Respondent for execution of composite works relating to the establishment of a new Modular Penex Unit and associated works at the Bina Refinery. Pursuant to the tendering process, the work was awarded to the Appellant under a Letter of Acceptance dated 31 December 2016, stipulating completion within five months, i.e., by

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Decree Execution Under Order XXI CPC – An In-depth Insight

Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 provides the comprehensive framework for executing decrees in Indian civil litigation. This article examines the procedural mechanisms for decree execution, including filing execution petitions, methods of property attachment, and the legal processes for recovering money decrees through sale of attached assets.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Article

Section 35(3) BNSS Notice Is The Rule, Arrest An Exception For Offences Up To 7 Years: Supreme Court

In Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation, 2026 INSC 115, the Supreme Court of India has reiterated and strengthened the safeguards governing arrest under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), holding that issuance of notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS is the rule in cases involving offences punishable with imprisonment of up to seven years.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Vaish Associates Advocates
Vaish Associates Advocates
Article

The Limitation Clock On Money Recovery: Understanding Article 113, Acknowledgment And Extension Under Indian Law

Understanding the critical timelines and legal frameworks governing money recovery suits in India requires navigating the complex interplay between the Limitation Act of 1963 and the Indian Contract Act of 1872. When does the clock actually start ticking on your right to sue, and how can acknowledgments or digital evidence extend or restart that crucial three-year window?
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Article

Newsletter August Disputes

This newsletter examines recent Supreme Court judgments across arbitration, civil law, criminal law, insolvency, and white-collar crime. Key rulings address the binding of non-signatories to arbitration agreements, the scope of "industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, limitations on FIR registration following Section 156(3) rejections, and the evidentiary requirements for proving bribery demands under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Article

Competition Monthly - September 2026 Edition

The Competition Commission of India has issued significant rulings on anti-competitive practices in agricultural input distribution and tire procurement, while also approving major acquisitions in sports franchising and education technology. These decisions demonstrate the CCI's active enforcement against bid-rigging and boycott campaigns, alongside its assessment of market consolidation in emerging sectors.
IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Article

From Fan Edits To AI Clones: Who Owns A Celebrity’s Face, Voice And ‘Vibe’? Personality Rights, Copyright, And Freedom Of Expression In India’s Creator Economy

A celebrity’s face appears in a meme. Their voice is recreated to say something they never said. An influencer becomes the unwilling face of a product they have never endorsed. Meanwhile, millions of users continue to make fan edits, reaction videos, parody accounts and humorous reels using the same celebrities’ images and voices.
IndiaIntellectual Property
Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal