Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JUNE 2021

Newsletter, April & May, 2021

The Supreme Court observed that under usual circumstances a High Court in its jurisdiction under Article 226 has to decline to entertain a dispute which is arbitrable, unless there is a fundamental issue of public interest.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Judgments

Rapid MetroRail Gurgaon Limited vs. Haryana Mass Rapid Transport Corporation1

The Supreme Court observed that under usual circumstances a High Court in its jurisdiction under Article 226 has to decline to entertain a dispute which is arbitrable, unless there is a fundamental issue of public interest.

The Court observed that "as a measure of abundant caution, we clarify that ordinarily the High Court in its jurisdiction under Article 226 would decline to entertain a dispute which is arbitrable. Moreover, remedies are available under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for seeking interim directions either under Section 9 before the Court vested with jurisdiction or under Section 17 before the Arbitral Tribunal itself."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from