Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JUNE 2025

Monthly Newsletter - May 2025

Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Contributor
Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal is a leading full-service Indian law firm, founded in 2008, providing comprehensive...

View firm profile
Explore more from Phoenix Legal

The present dispute arose out of a contract executed between the appellant i.e., Union of India, and the respondent i.e., Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd., for execution of electrical works (Package-III) at AIIMS, Patna.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aman Avinav
Aman Avinav
Rahul Tyagi
Rahul Tyagi
Kumar Rishabh Parth
Kumar Rishabh Parth
Author LinkedIn connections

INSIDE

ARBITRATION

  • Union of India v. Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd. FAO(OS)(COMM) 108 of 2023 and CM Nos. 26534 of 2023 and 26535 of 2023

CIVIL LAW

  • IEEE Mumbai Section Welfare Association v. Global IEEE Institute for Engineers Civil Appeal No. 7235 of 2025 (SLP (Civil) No. 14208 of 2025)
  • Kamla Nehru Memorial Trust & Anr. v. UP State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors. Civil Appeal arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 31887-88 of 2017

INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY LAW

  • Kalyani Transco v. Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. & Ors. Civil Appeal No. 1808 of 2020
  • Asha Basantilal Surana v. State Bank of India Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 84 of 2025 and I.A. No. 334 of 2025

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Decree Execution Under Order XXI CPC – An In-depth Insight

Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 provides the comprehensive framework for executing decrees in Indian civil litigation. This article examines the procedural mechanisms for decree execution, including filing execution petitions, methods of property attachment, and the legal processes for recovering money decrees through sale of attached assets.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Article

The Limitation Clock On Money Recovery: Understanding Article 113, Acknowledgment And Extension Under Indian Law

Understanding the critical timelines and legal frameworks governing money recovery suits in India requires navigating the complex interplay between the Limitation Act of 1963 and the Indian Contract Act of 1872. When does the clock actually start ticking on your right to sue, and how can acknowledgments or digital evidence extend or restart that crucial three-year window?
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Article

Section 35(3) BNSS Notice Is The Rule, Arrest An Exception For Offences Up To 7 Years: Supreme Court

In Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation, 2026 INSC 115, the Supreme Court of India has reiterated and strengthened the safeguards governing arrest under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), holding that issuance of notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS is the rule in cases involving offences punishable with imprisonment of up to seven years.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Vaish Associates Advocates
Vaish Associates Advocates
Article

Newsletter August Disputes

This newsletter examines recent Supreme Court judgments across arbitration, civil law, criminal law, insolvency, and white-collar crime. Key rulings address the binding of non-signatories to arbitration agreements, the scope of "industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, limitations on FIR registration following Section 156(3) rejections, and the evidentiary requirements for proving bribery demands under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Article

Competition Monthly - September 2026 Edition

The Competition Commission of India has issued significant rulings on anti-competitive practices in agricultural input distribution and tire procurement, while also approving major acquisitions in sports franchising and education technology. These decisions demonstrate the CCI's active enforcement against bid-rigging and boycott campaigns, alongside its assessment of market consolidation in emerging sectors.
IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal