Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JUNE 2026

Foreign Summary Decrees Under Scrutiny: Supreme Court Reaffirms ‘Merits’ Test Under Section 13 Of CPC

The Supreme Court of India has significantly altered the landscape for enforcing foreign summary judgments in India by holding that English summary judgments refusing leave to defend cannot be considered judgments "on the merits" under Indian law. This landmark ruling examines whether a foreign court's refusal to grant leave to defend, despite the existence of bona fide triable issues, satisfies the requirements of natural justice and merits-based adjudication under the Code of Civil Procedure.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

1. The Supreme Court of India in Griesheim GMBH v. Goyal MG Gases (P) Ltd. [1] , (“Messer Griesheim”), examined the enforceability of an English summary judgment in India under Section 44A read with Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”). Dismissing the decree-holder’s appeal, the Supreme Court held that a foreign decree obtained through summary procedure where leave to defend is refused despite the existence of bona fide triable issues cannot be regarded as a judgment “on the merits” within the meaning of Section 13(b) of CPC. The Supreme Court further held that such a decree also falls foul of the principles of natural justice under Section 13(d) of CPC and is therefore not conclusive or enforceable in India.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from