Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 FEBRUARY 2026

Dispute Resolution & Arbitration Monthly Update | January 2026

The Respondents, Central Public Works Department (Respondent No. 1) and M/s. Supreme Infrastructure India Limited (Respondent No. 2), are parties in an ongoing arbitration.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Indian Institute of Technology, Mandi Vs. C.P.W.D & Anr

2025:HHC:45660

Background facts

  • The Respondents, Central Public Works Department (Respondent No. 1) and M/s. Supreme Infrastructure India Limited (Respondent No. 2), are parties in an ongoing arbitration. The Petitioner had filed an application before the Ld. Arbitrator to be impleaded as a respondent in the said arbitration. The said application was rejected by the Ld. Arbitrator vide their order dated 18th April 2025 ('Impugned Order'). In the instant case, the Petitioner is challenging the Impugned Order.
  • A Memorandum of Understanding ('MOU') was executed on 25th August 2011 between Petitioner and Respondent No. 1 whereby the Respondent No. 1 was to carry out construction work of academic and residential complex for the Petitioner. Clause 8 of the MOU states that the disputes between the parties will be referred to arbitration.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from