Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 SEPTEMBER 2025

Dispute Resolution & ADR Newsletter - September 2025

The September 2025 edition of Fox & Mandal's Dispute Resolution & ADR Newsletter analyses the validity of an unsigned arbitration agreement; jurisdiction of NCLT to adjudicate on fraud integral to oppression and mismanagement; enforceability of non-money consumer fora orders passed between 2003 and 2020; prevalence of exclusive jurisdiction clause over any contractual or subsequent designation of the seat; and other recent judgments of the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

An unsigned arbitration clause is enforceable if the parties' conduct evidences consent

Glencore International AG v. SGM Metals

Supreme Court of India | 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1815

The Supreme Court recently held that an arbitration clause in an unsigned contract may be valid if the parties' conduct evidences consent. This ruling provides a significant clarification that even an unsigned arbitration agreement can bind parties where consent is evident through conduct and correspondence. It reduces the risk of opportunistic avoidance of arbitration by withholding signatures and reinforces confidence in India's pro-arbitration stance. Businesses should ensure meticulous documentation – through invoices, bank instruments, and communications – to evidence consent. The decision strengthens contractual certainty and signals that substance, not mere formality, governs arbitration enforceability.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from