One Person Company's sole shareholder cannot be held liable
without su8icient grounds to pierce the corporate veil
Saravana Prasad v. Endemol India Pvt Ltd
Bombay High Court | Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No.
22714 of 2024 In a dispute arising from an agreement entered into
by a One Person Company (OPC), the Bombay High
Court recently set aside the arbitral tribunal's interim order
directing the OPC's sole shareholder to secure the disputed
amount. The decision reaffirms that the concepts of separate legal
personality and limited liability of a company are not lost in the
case of an OPC, even when it may appear convenient and natural to
extend the liability to its sole shareholder. The corporate veil
cannot be pierced in a routine manner if the necessary conditions
– such as fraud, collusion, evasion of taxes, etc – are
not met. By upholding the rigours for piercing the corporate veil
for an OPC, the decision affirms the special protection granted