Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 AUGUST 2025

Dispute Resolution & ADR Newsletter - August 2025

The August 2025 edition of Fox & Mandal's Dispute Resolution & ADR Newsletter analyses the grant of anti-arbitration injunctions in foreign seated arbitrations; enforceability of non-compete clauses in employment contracts; whether registration alone can establish ownership; highest bona fide sale exemplar for determining market value; conciliation under MSMED Act, 2006 not subject to limitation; and other recent judgments of the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Civil Courts can grant anti-arbitration injunctions in foreign-seated arbitrations

Engineering Projects (India) Ltd v. MSA Global LLP

Delhi High Court | 2025 SCC OnLine Del 5072

The Delhi High Court recently stayed proceedings in a foreign-seated arbitration on the ground that the co-arbitrator had failed to disclose his prior involvement with the counterparty. While the Court reiterated that such powers must be exercised only in exceptional cases – where the proceedings are found to be vexatious, oppressive, or a misuse of legal process – it emphasised that the neutrality of the arbitral tribunal, which lies at the core of fair adjudication, cannot be sacrificed at the altar of minimal judicial interference. Such relief, consistent with the cautious stance in jurisdictions like England, Singapore, and Hong Kong, is reserved for clear cases of abuse or procedural unfairness. Transparent disclosures and good-faith conduct are essential to avoid such disputes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from