Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 SEPTEMBER 2022

Delhi High Court Issues Directions To MeitY- Tanul Thakur v. UOI

S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Contributor
S.S. Rana & Co.

S.S. Rana & Co.

Established in 1989, S.S. Rana & Co. is a premier intellectual property and corporate law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from S.S. Rana & Co.

In a recent case, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court vide its order in the case Tanul Thakur v. Union of India , has directed the Committee constituted by MeitY (Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology) under the...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a recent case, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court vide its order in the case Tanul Thakur v. Union of India1 , has directed the Committee constituted by MeitY (Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology) under the Blocking Rules, 2009 to give a post-decisional hearing to the Petitioner for corrective measures and to provide a copy of the original blocking order to the website's owner.

Introduction

Democracy and censorship are theoretically incompatible concepts. Censorship in democracy defeats the mere idea/ notion of democracy. Democracy entails certain important freedoms, with one of the most important and revered ones being the right to freedom of expression. Censorship in any form (whether arguably justified or unjustified) certainly steps on the toes of the idea of democracy, and as such, any move made by democratically elected governments to impose censorship is met with much scrutiny and distrust.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from