Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 MARCH 2019

Conundrum Around The Fourth Schedule Vis-À-Vis Section 38 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996

S&A Law Offices
S&A Law Offices
Contributor
S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices is a full-service law firm headquartered in Delhi NCR. The firm has 300+...

View firm profile
Explore more from S&A Law Offices

The remedy for healthy development of arbitration in India is to disclose the fees structure before the appointment of arbitrators so that any party who is unwilling to bear such expenses can express his unwillingness.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

INTRODUCTION

"The remedy for healthy development of arbitration in India is to disclose the fees structure before the appointment of arbitrators so that any party who is unwilling to bear such expenses can express his unwillingness. Another remedy is Institutional Arbitration where the arbitrator's fee is pre-fixed. The third is for each High Court to have a scale of arbitrator's fee suitably calibrated with reference to the amount involved in the dispute. This will also avoid different designates prescribing different fee structures. By these methods, there may be a reasonable check on the fees and the cost of arbitration, thereby making arbitration, both national and international, attractive to the litigant public. Reasonableness and certainty about total costs are the key to the development of arbitration. Be that as it may."1 The abovementioned observations of Justice R.V. Raveendran highlight that one of the primary concerns regarding arbitration in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from