Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JANUARY 2023

Choosing The Right Arbitral Seat

Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Contributor
Khaitan & Co.

Khaitan & Co.

Founded in 1911, Khaitan & Co is a heritage law firm that has been a trusted adviser to leading...

View firm profile
Explore more from Khaitan & Co.

Law relating to arbitration in India has been evolving through various decisions of courts and amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Law relating to arbitration in India has been evolving through various decisions of courts and amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Act"). PASL Wind Solutions (P) Ltd. v. GE Power Conversion (India) (P) Ltd. (2021) 7 SCC 1 ("PASL Judgement") was one such landmark decision wherein the Supreme Court of India allowed 2 (two) Indian parties to choose a seat of arbitration outside India. In this case, an arbitration agreement was entered into between 2 (two) Indian Parties being PASL Wind Solutions Pvt. Ltd. ("PASL") and GE Power Conversion India Pvt. Ltd. ("GE"), the agreement mentioned Zurich as the seat of arbitration. Arbitration was invoked by PASL due a dispute relating to supply and warranties of certain converters. GE being the respondent in the arbitration had objected to the seat being in Zurich, however the arbitrator upheld that the seat would be Zurich and the venue would be Mumbai as per the suggestion and convenience of parties. The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this document does not necessarily reflect the views / position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up, please contact Khaitan & Co at [email protected].

See more popular content from