INTRODUCTION
In the case of Cars24 Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Cyber Approach
Workspace Lip, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi has set forth an
important legal principle in answering the question of whether the
seat of Arbitration could exercise jurisdiction to appoint an
arbitrator even though the lease deed in question vested the power
to appoint Sole Arbitrator with another court.
BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE
In this matter, Cyber Approach Workspace LLP (the respondent)
executed a lease deed under which an interest-free refundable
security deposit of Rs. 52,80,000/ was paid by Cars24 Services Pvt.
Ltd. (the petitioner) for the leased premises. Because of COVID-19,
the petitioner invoked the force majeure clause to terminate the
lease deed and subsequently claimed the refundable security
deposit. The respondent denied any liability toward the petitioner.
According to the deed, if any dispute arose between the parties,
then it shall be referred to a Sole Arbitrator who shall