Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JANUARY 2020

Arbitration Weekly Update - Imax Corporation v. E-City Entertainment & Others

On the other hand, the Petitioner argued that the limitation period should be the same as for execution of a decree, i.e. twelve years.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This week, we take a look at a recent decision of the Bombay High Court (Court) in Imax Corporation v. E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.In this case, three foreign arbitral awards were brought before the Court in a combined petition for enforcement and execution, under section 47 and 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act). As the petition had been made approximately 10 years after the passing of the final award, the Court was required to determine what would be the limitation period for such a petition. The Respondent contended that there was no specific provision dealing with limitation for enforcement of foreign awards, and hence the residuary provision would apply, which provides a limitation period of three years. On the other hand, the Petitioner argued that the limitation period should be the same as for execution of a decree, i.e. twelve years. In deciding this issue, the Court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Fuerst Day Lawson v.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from