Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JANUARY 2015

Protecting Quasi Judicial Authorities From Executive

Recently, Clause No. 3 of a notification issued by the Controller of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks...

IndiaIntellectual Property

Recently, Clause No. 3 of a notification issued by the Controller of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (Controller General) relating to amendment in application for registration of trade mark was challenged before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Intellectual Property Attorneys Association vs. Union of India & Anr. The Hon'ble Court was pleased to set aside the impugned Clause No.3 of the notification and held that statutory discretion vested in quasi-judicial bodies cannot be interfered with by higher executives. A copy of the order can be found here.

Facts

A writ petition was filed by the Petitioner challenging the validity of Clause No. 3 of the Office Order No.16 of 2012-2013 dated 8th June, 2012 issued by the Controller General, the relevant part of which states that "No request for amendment shall be allowed which seeks substantial alteration in the application for registration of trademark. The substantial amendment in the trademark, proprietor details,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from