ARTICLE · 02 JANUARY 2025

IPR Weekly Highlights (61)

Lex Mantis

Explore more from Lex Mantis

The Bombay HC has stayed a ₹4.5 crore fine imposed on Patanjali Ayurved in a trademark infringement case.

IndiaIntellectual Property

TRADEMARK

BOMBAY HC STAYS ₹4.5 CR PENALTY IMPOSED ON PATANJALI

The Bombay HC has stayed a ₹4.5 crore fine imposed on Patanjali Ayurved in a trademark infringement case. The fine was imposed on Patanjali for violating a court order that prohibited the sale of camphor products that allegedly infringed Mangalam Organics' trademark. Patanjali challenged the fine imposition in the Division Bench of the HC.
While the HC stayed the fine, it allowed ₹50 lakh already deposited by Patanjali to remain with the court.

(1) Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. & Anr. vs. Mangalam Organics Ltd. & Ors (Interim Application (L) No.26085 of 2024 In Commercial Appeal (ST) No.26060 of 2024)

TRADEMARK

DELHI HC CLOSES IMPERIAL HOTEL TRADEMARK DISPUTE

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Drafting IP Assignment Clauses In India: Copyright, Patents And Contractor Agreements

IndiaIntellectual Property

King, Stubb & Kasiva

Personality Rights In India: A Practical Guide For Brands, Ad Agencies And AI Companies

IndiaIntellectual Property

The Evolving Interface Between Geographical Indications And Trademarks

IndiaIntellectual Property

Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants

GUI And Icon Designs In India: CGPDTM’s Draft Guidelines Open The Door, With Conditions

IndiaIntellectual Property

S.S. Rana & Co.

Process Patent Infringement And The Burden Of Proof Under Section 104A In India: Lessons From NOCIL v. Finorchem

IndiaIntellectual Property

S.S. Rana & Co.

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Intellectual Property

Related Comparative Guides

Comparative Guide

Trademark Disputes

Comparative Guide

Intellectual Property

Comparative Guide

Patent Litigation

Comparative Guide

Franchise & Licensing

See more popular content from

Intellectual Property

How To Check Indian Patent Application Status?

Indian patent application status refers to the latest status of an application in the tracking system of the Indian Patent Office.

IndiaIntellectual Property

YouTube Copyright Strikes Explained: How Creators Can Protect Their Content

YouTube operates within the framework of international copyright laws and has policies to protect intellectual property owners while balancing fair use.

IndiaIntellectual Property

De Penning & De Penning

Trademark Registration Fees In India: Complete Fees Structure

Learn about the trademark registration fees in India, including costs for individuals, startups, and businesses. Understand filing methods, additional charges, and more.

IndiaIntellectual Property

Copy, Right? ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC

When an artificial intelligence system is trained on copyrighted news content, and later answers a user’s question using what it learned, has the law been broken? On 24th July 2026, the Delhi High Court answered that question, at least for now. In ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC, Justice Amit Bansal declined to grant an interim injunction against OpenAI, holding, on a prima facie, interim stage view, that the company’s use of ANI’s news content to train its large language models (“LLMs”) falls within the fair dealing exception under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957

IndiaIntellectual Property

S.S. Rana & Co.

AI, Deepfakes & Copyright In India: The 2026 Legal Position

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the production, reproduction and dissemination of creative works, as well as posing intricate challenges for copyright law. A major type of synthetic media, deepfakes also pose further issues regarding copyright violations, personality rights, privacy concerns, and intermediary liability.

IndiaIntellectual Property

Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants

India’s Patent Office Sets Guardrails For AI-Assisted Examination

The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks published the Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Patent Examination Procedures on August 7, 2026, laying down a framework for the use of AI in patent examination.

IndiaIntellectual Property

AI Training Data, Copyright Risk And Commercial Liability: What Businesses Need To Know

On 8 October 2026, USA Today Co. and its affiliated newspaper companies, which publish 19 titles including USA Today, the Detroit Free Press and The Arizona Republic, sued seven OpenAI entities in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that OpenAI copied their journalism to train its models, stripped identifying information from it, and now uses those models to give ChatGPT users summaries that substitute for the original reporting. The publishers seek more than USD 250 million in damages, an injunction and an order for the destruction of models and training sets containing their content.

IndiaIntellectual Property

Can A Publisher Say No To AI? India's Copyright Debate After ANI v OpenAI

The Delhi High Court has, for now, treated AI training as fair dealing. The government has proposed a licence that no rights holder could refuse. Publishers abroad are building their own technical standards. Between the three lies the question Indian law has not yet answered: whether a copyright owner can refuse to let its work train a machine, and what that refusal is worth.

IndiaIntellectual Property

India's First AI Copyright Ruling: The Delhi High Court In ANI v. OpenAI

The Delhi High Court, in ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. OpenAI OpCo LLC, has delivered India's first significant ruling on the application of copyright law to the training and functioning of large language models ("LLMs").

IndiaIntellectual Property

Authorship vs Ownership Of Work Under The Copyright Act; What Is The Difference?

The Copyright Act, 1957 uses two different terms for a work- ‘Authorship' and ‘Ownership'. Is there a difference between the two?

IndiaIntellectual Property

Naik Naik & Company