Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 DECEMBER 2020

Interim Injunction In IPR: An Indian Experience

Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Explore more from Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

The availability of appropriate reliefs in cases of patent infringement is the key for ensuring the global patent protectionist regime.

IndiaIntellectual Property

INTRODUCTION

The availability of appropriate reliefs in cases of patent infringement is the key for ensuring the global patent protectionist regime. Patent act 1970 (hereinafter referred to as 'act') provides a legal framework for the functioning of patent system in India. Section 108 of the act provides for reliefs that a court may grant in the suits of patent infringement. Basically it provides two kinds of remedies: one is the grant of injunction against the patent infringer and second is the appropriate damages that the patentee has suffered from the infringement of his patent. Both of these remedies are granted after the actual determination of infringement. This kind of situation, many a times, poses a difficulty for the patent holder to retain and hold damages, arising out of infringement, till the actual guilt is proven. Therefore, the patentee generally pleads for an interim injunction as a temporary and immediate remedy. The act, primarily, is silent about

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from