Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JULY 2025

Comparative Advertising Shouldn't Leave A Stain On Brand Reputation

In the case of Hindustan Unilever Limited v. RSPL Limited, underlining the fine line between comparative advertising and defamation, the Delhi High Court passed an interim order involving an aggressive advertising campaign that allegedly disparaged the iconic detergent brand Surf Excel.

IndiaIntellectual Property

In the case of Hindustan Unilever Limited v. RSPL Limited, underlining the fine line between comparative advertising and defamation, the Delhi High Court passed an interim order involving an aggressive advertising campaign that allegedly disparaged the iconic detergent brand Surf Excel. The Court's observations reiterate the evolving boundaries of advertising ethics, trademark protection, and brand personality under Indian IP jurisprudence.

Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL), one of India's largest FMCG companies, approached the Delhi High Court seeking an injunction against RSPL Ltd., the manufacturer of Ghadi detergent. The grievance stemmed from a series of four television and digital commercials released by Ghadi in June 2025 for its 'Ghadi' detergent powder. HUL alleged that these ads indirectly targeted its Surf Excel product and deployed derogatory language and misleading inferences that tarnished its brand reputation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from