Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JULY 2008

Assignment´ Looked Into By Copyright Board

Lex Orbis
Explore more from Lex Orbis

The substantive point of law covered in the present case, Bharati Dutta v. Dr. Saradindu Basu & Anr. 2008 (37) PTC 178 (CB), pertains to section 19A (2) of the Copyright Act, 1957.

IndiaIntellectual Property
Manisha Singh
Manisha Singh
Author LinkedIn connections

The substantive point of law covered in the present case, Bharati Dutta v. Dr. Saradindu Basu & Anr. 2008 (37) PTC 178 (CB), pertains to section 19A (2) of the Copyright Act, 1957. The particular section enumerates the mode of assignment of copyright. Assignment of copyright is explained under section 18 of the Copyright Act 1957.

Section 19: Mode of assignment –

[(1)] No assignment of the copyright in any work shall be valid unless it is in writing signed by the assignor or by his duly authorised agent.

(2) The assignment of copyright in any work shall identify such work, and shall specify the rights assigned and the duration and territorial extent of such assignment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Copy, Right? ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC

When an artificial intelligence system is trained on copyrighted news content, and later answers a user’s question using what it learned, has the law been broken? On 24th July 2026, the Delhi High Court answered that question, at least for now. In ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC, Justice Amit Bansal declined to grant an interim injunction against OpenAI, holding, on a prima facie, interim stage view, that the company’s use of ANI’s news content to train its large language models (“LLMs”) falls within the fair dealing exception under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957
IndiaIntellectual Property
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

AI Training Data, Copyright Risk And Commercial Liability: What Businesses Need To Know

On 8 October 2026, USA Today Co. and its affiliated newspaper companies, which publish 19 titles including USA Today, the Detroit Free Press and The Arizona Republic, sued seven OpenAI entities in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that OpenAI copied their journalism to train its models, stripped identifying information from it, and now uses those models to give ChatGPT users summaries that substitute for the original reporting. The publishers seek more than USD 250 million in damages, an injunction and an order for the destruction of models and training sets containing their content.
IndiaIntellectual Property
Legitpro Law
Legitpro Law