Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 AUGUST 2021

SECTION 60 (5) OF THE IBC - AN UNRESOLVED CONUNDRUM

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co
Contributor
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

Founded on a century of legal achievements, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (SAM & Co) was born...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

The National Company Law Tribunal's ("NCLT") jurisdiction under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC") has often been invoked as a comprehensive recourse to all issues...

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Ameya Gokhale
Ameya Gokhale
Radhika Indapurkar
Radhika Indapurkar
Author LinkedIn connections

SECTION 60 (5) OF THE IBC - AN UNRESOLVED CONUNDRUM1

I. Introduction

  1. The National Company Law Tribunal's ("NCLT") jurisdiction under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC") has often been invoked as a comprehensive recourse to all issues concerning a corporate debtor undergoing corporate insolvency resolution process ("CIRP") or liquidation. In recent times, the Supreme Court has had the occasion to opine on the scope and extent of NCLT's jurisdiction under Section 60(5) in the judgments of M/s Embassy Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka and Ors.2 ("Embassy") and Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Amit Kumar Gupta and Ors.3 ("Gujarat Urja") wherein it would appear that the Supreme Court has recognized the limitations inherent to the NCLT's powers thereunder.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from