Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 FEBRUARY 2023

Landmark Judgments – IBC Yearly Round-Up 2022

Sarthak Advocates & Solicitors
Sarthak Advocates & Solicitors
Contributor
Sarthak Advocates & Solicitors

Sarthak Advocates & Solicitors

Sarthak Advocates & Solicitors is a full-service law firm focused on corporate and commercial laws....

View firm profile
Explore more from Sarthak Advocates & Solicitors

Previously there existed a mechanical role of the National Company Law Tribunal ("NCLT") in CIRPs initiated by a financial creditor under Section 7 of the Code.

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Aman Choudhary
Aman Choudhary
Saumya Upadhyay
Saumya Upadhyay
Author LinkedIn connections

Vidarbha Industries Power Limited v. Axis Bank Limited (Civil Appeal No. 4633 of 2021):

Previously there existed a mechanical role of the National Company Law Tribunal ("NCLT") in CIRPs initiated by a financial creditor under Section 7 of the Code. However, in this judgment, the Supreme Court held that there exists a discretionary power to admit or reject a petition despite the financial creditor satisfying the debt and default test or twin test.

In this case, Vidharbha Industries was a power generation company and there was a sum of INR 1,730 crores realisable by it in terms of the order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity ("APTEL"). In light of the order, the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that the amount receivable was more than the claim amount and therefore the touchstone for initiating the insolvency does not lie in a mechanical exercise of jurisdiction in the admission of CIRPs under Section 7 of the Code. Moreover, the Court also gave the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from