Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 APRIL 2022

Between The Lines...April 2022

The Bombay High Court ("BHC") has in the judgement dated February 28, 2022 ("Judgement"), in the matter of Pigments and Allieds v. Carboline

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Article by Vijay Pal Dalmia, Advocate, Supreme Court of India and Delhi High Court, Partner & Head of Intellectual Property Laws Division, Vaish Associates Advocates, India
Email id: [email protected]
Mobile No.: +91 9810081079

Key Highlights

  1. BHC: Once parties acknowledge existence of arbitration clause, court can appoint arbitrator even if stamp duty is insufficiently paid.
  2. NCLT: Resolution Plan cannot be rejected on a perceived grievance by a suspended director who failed to take steps.
  3. NCLAT: There is no conflict between Section 17B of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
  4. NCLT: No insolvency proceedings can be initiated under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against personal guarantors of Non-Banking Financial Companies unless threshold of asset size of INR 500 Crores is satisfied.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

© 2026, Vaish Associates Advocates,
All rights reserved
Advocates, 1st & 11th Floors, Mohan Dev Building 13, Tolstoy Marg New Delhi-110001 (India).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist professional advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. The views expressed in this article are solely of the authors of this article.

See more popular content from