Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MAY 2025

The Legality Of Post-Exit Non-Compete Clauses

Remfry & Sagar
Remfry & Sagar
Contributor

Remfry & Sagar

Established in 1827, Remfry & Sagar has pioneered IP law in India. The firm’s depth of experience...

View firm profile
Explore more from Remfry & Sagar

Post-employment restraints must be reasonable, narrowly tailored and justified by a legitimate business interest to withstand judicial scrutiny.

IndiaEmployment and HR

Post-employment restraints must be reasonable, narrowly tailored and justified by a legitimate business interest to withstand judicial scrutiny.

In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has reaffirmed that unreasonable non-compete clauses imposed on employees or business partners post-separation are unenforceable and that contractual restraints on professional freedom must be reasonable and legally sound (Cigma Events Pvt. Ltd. vs. Deepak Gupta & Ors., C.S. (OS) 1011/2024).

Background

Deepak Gupta was employed by Cigma Events Pvt. Ltd. as a senior executive. As part of his employment contract, Gupta agreed to a non-compete clause that barred him from working in a similar industry or interacting with the company's clients and vendors for two years following his departure. Regardless, after resigning, Gupta launched a competing venture. Cigma Events responded by filing a lawsuit seeking an injunction to restrain him from engaging in similar business

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from