Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 OCTOBER 2024

Stringent Measures Against Cybercrimes In India's New Criminal Justice System

JSA Advocates & Solicitors
JSA Advocates & Solicitors
Contributor
JSA Advocates & Solicitors

JSA Advocates & Solicitors

Established in 1991 Our services: JSA is a leading law firm in India with more than 600...

View firm profile
Explore more from JSA Advocates & Solicitors

On July 1, 2024, India's criminal justice system underwent a significant transformation with the introduction of 3 (three) new laws.

IndiaCriminal Law
Sajai Singh
Sajai Singh
Parvathy Manoj
Parvathy Manoj
Himanshu Kumar
Himanshu Kumar
Bhoomika Kumar
Bhoomika Kumar
Author LinkedIn connections

On July 1, 2024, India's criminal justice system underwent a significant transformation with the introduction of 3 (three) new laws namely the (a) 'Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023' ("BNS") replacing the Indian Penal Code, 1860; (b) the 'Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023' ("BNSS") replacing the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; and (c) the 'Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023' ("BSA") replacing the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (collectively referred to as the "New Criminal Laws" or "Legislations"). These Legislations are intended to operate prospectively, meaning any crime committed until midnight of June 30, 2024, will continue to be governed and prosecuted under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC"), the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (collectively referred to as the "Old Criminal Laws"). Consequently, the Old Criminal Laws will remain relevant for several years until all pending investigations, inquiries, trials, appeals, and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Understanding Forgery And Use Of A Forged Document

“Commercial disputes being given a criminal colour” is a routine issue faced by criminal courts across the country, and the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has also quashed several criminal complaints pertaining to commercial/civil claims for that reason. It is important to note that, in such criminal complaints, the usual allegations involve offences of cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and the use of forged documents.
IndiaCriminal Law
S&A Law Offices
S&A Law Offices
Article

Combatting Cyber Frauds In India: Prevention And Legal Remedies

In the vast expanse of the digital realm, where convenience, connectivity, and progress reign supreme, a new and insidious shadow looms. Cyber fraud has emerged as a formidable adversary, exploiting every crack in the virtual world. With the rise of online banking scams, phishing schemes, identity theft, and fraudulent transactions, the threat of cyber fraud has seeped into every corner of our digital lives.
IndiaCriminal Law
MZM Legal, Advocates & Legal Consultants
MZM Legal, Advocates & Legal Consultants
Article

The Supreme Court Of India Clarifies: Order II Rule 2 Of The Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 Cannot Be A Ground For Rejection Of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(D) Of The Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908

A two judge bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) in S. Valliammai and Ors. vs. S. Ramanathan and Anr. recently held that Order II Rule 2, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) cannot constitute a ground for rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC. The Supreme Court drew a critical distinction between the two provisions clarifying that while Order II Rule 2 curtails the right to sue for certain claims or reliefs, but it does not bar filing of a suit under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
JSA Advocates & Solicitors
JSA Advocates & Solicitors
Article

Supreme Court Clarifies That Compromise Decrees Asserting Pre-existing Rights Are Not Subject To Registration Or Payment Of Stamp Duty

In the recent case of Mukesh vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr., the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India adjudicated on the issue of whether compromise decrees that assert pre-existing rights necessitate registration under the Registration Act, 1908 and are subject to stamp duty under the Indian Stamp Act of 1899.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
JSA Advocates & Solicitors
JSA Advocates & Solicitors
Article

Services Sector Employment Rules Take Shape: Model Standing Orders, 2026 Under The Industrial Relations Code, 2020

On May 8, 2026, the Ministry of Labour and Employment notified the Model Standing Orders, 2026 (“Model Standing Orders 2026”) under Section 29(1) of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (“IR Code”). The notification supersedes the earlier Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central Rules, 1946 insofar as they related to model standing orders, and prescribes separate model standing orders for the mining, manufacturing and services sectors.
IndiaEmployment and HR
JSA Advocates & Solicitors
JSA Advocates & Solicitors