Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 APRIL 2026

“Loss” In Indemnity Clauses: Why The Definition Does The Real Work

In most commercial contracts, particularly M&A and shareholders’ agreements, indemnity clauses are subject to significant negotiation. Parties debate triggers, caps, survival periods, baskets, and carve outs. Yet, in practice, one element that often receives less explicit attention ends up doing much of the economic work, the definition of “Loss”.

IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law

Introduction

In most commercial contracts, particularly M&A and shareholders’ agreements, indemnity clauses are subject to significant negotiation. Parties debate triggers, caps, survival periods, baskets, and carveouts. Yet, in practice, one element that often receives less explicit attention ends up doing much of the economic work, the definition of “Loss”.

It is common to see a broadly drafted indemnity provision sitting alongside a definition of “Loss” that quietly narrows what can actually be recovered. Conversely, a carefully considered definition can materially expand the commercial protection beyond what the indemnity wording appears to promise on its face.

From a practical standpoint, the indemnity gives the right to claim; the definition of “Loss” determines what that right is worth.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from