Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 AUGUST 2023

JSA Prism Consumer Protection

JSA Advocates & Solicitors
JSA Advocates & Solicitors
Contributor
JSA Advocates & Solicitors

JSA Advocates & Solicitors

Established in 1991 Our services: JSA is a leading law firm in India with more than 600...

View firm profile
Explore more from JSA Advocates & Solicitors

A Special Leave Petition to the Supreme Court against an order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in its appellate jurisdiction is not maintainable.

IndiaConsumer Protection

A Special Leave Petition to the Supreme Court against an order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in its appellate jurisdiction is not maintainable.

The Supreme Court of India ("Supreme Court") has in M/s. Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited v. Suresh Chand Jain & Anr.1 held that a petition filed before the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution of India ("Constitution") seeking special leave to appeal against an order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ("NCDRC") in its appellate jurisdiction is not maintainable.

Brief Facts

Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited ("Insurer") issued 2 (two) insurance policies covering fire and theft ("Insurance Policy") in favour of Mr. Suresh Chand Jain ("Suresh Jain") through Allahabad Bank ("Bank") (acting as an intermediary of the Insurer).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from