Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 DECEMBER 2018

Central Vigilance Commission: The Competition Commission's New Ally?

The Competition Commission of India (the "Commission") has held that bids by entities belonging to the same group cannot per se be considered as amounting to cartelisation under the Competition Act, 2002.

IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law

1. INTRODUCTION

The Competition Commission of India (the "Commission")1 has held that bids by entities belonging to the same group cannot per se be considered as amounting to cartelisation under the Competition Act, 2002 (the "Act").

2. BACKGROUND

In a tender for the procurement of steel cord belt floated by NLC India Limited ("NLCIL"), three group companies (the "Phoenix Entities") pitched to supply NLCIL with the material, along with one other entity, Bridgestone Engineered ("Bridgestone") (together, the "Tenderers").

Bridgestone was denied participation in the said tender due to its inability to meet the technical pre-qualification requirements. Subsequently, Sumeru (the authorised representative of Bridgestone) wrote to NLCIL, suggesting that if Bridgestone was not considered, there would be no competitive bidding as the other remaining bidders were sister concerns.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from