Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 OCTOBER 2016

Lessons To Be Learned From A Recent Guernsey Regulatory Matter

We were recently instructed by a Bank in relation to a regulatory matter. The Bank had made a suspicious activity report to the FIU due to their concerns about the potential source of funds in an account.

GuernseyWealth Management

We were recently instructed by a Bank in relation to a regulatory matter. The Bank had made a suspicious activity report to the Financial Investigation Unit ("FIU") due to their concerns about the potential source of funds in an account. These concerns were raised by two articles which had been discovered in the public domain relating to an individual and his conviction by a Brussels court of VAT fraud. It was the Bank's belief that the individual was primarily the source of wealth for the account and it did not know whether the funds were the proceeds of crime. Following correspondence with the FIU the Bank was told that it did not have consent to end the relationship with the customer. As a consequence, the Bank was prohibited from transferring or otherwise disposing of the funds pursuant to section 39(3) of the Criminal Justice (Proceeds of Crime)(Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 1999.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from