Michelle Spencer
AI adoption in legal has crossed a threshold that should prompt every firm leader to ask a harder question. According to the Wolters Kluwer 2026 Future Ready Lawyer Survey of 810 lawyers, 92% of respondents now use at least one AI tool in their daily workflow, with more than half reporting time savings of 6–20% of their work week and 60% expecting their organization’s AI investment to grow over the next three years.
That’s not a trend. That’s table stakes. And table stakes, by definition, don’t differentiate you.
When every firm has access to the same large language models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini), the model stops being the moat. The question shifts from which AI are you using to what is your AI grounded in. That’s where most firms are about to discover a significant gap between the tools they’ve deployed and the outcomes they expected.