Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JULY 2022

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

What Is The Blocking Effect Of Chinese Cross-border Data Transfer Laws On Foreign Discovery Systems?

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Recently, the United States District Court of the Northern District of California rejected a Chinese company's argument of China's restriction of cross-border data transfer as a legal justification, and has required the...

GlobalPrivacy

Recently, the United States District Court of the Northern District of California rejected a Chinese company's argument of China's restriction of cross-border data transfer as a legal justification, and has required the defendant in China to fulfil their duty of discovery of evidence. This acts as a yellow light warning to Chinese companies involved in foreign litigations.

We take a look at this case below.

Case background

Defendant Syntronic (Beijing) Technology R&D Center Co., Ltd. (a wholly-owned subsidiary, located in China, of a Swedish company) has filed a motion for reconsideration addressing the Court's prior support of the discovery request proposed by Plaintiff Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Ultimately, the Court upheld the original discovery order, and held that there was no conflict between Chinese law and the Court's previous order. This thereby required the defendant to provide the 24 computers in their control to the plaintiff for inspection in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from