Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JUNE 2016

Third-Party Litigation Funding Revolutionizing Commercial Litigation, Despite Some Challenges In Common Law

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

One of the most critical developments in civil – and potentially, commercial – litigation in recent years has been the growth of third-party financing of legal costs for cases that might not otherwise have their day in court.

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

One of the most critical developments in civil – and potentially, commercial – litigation in recent years has been the growth of third-party financing of legal costs for cases that might not otherwise have their day in court. Originating in Australia and the UK more than a decade ago, third-party litigation funding agreements (LFAs), in which institutions offer financing for a percentage of any monetary recovery in the case, are enabling plaintiffs to seek justice through court actions that otherwise would be cost-prohibitive. This includes fraud, environmental, and corporate cases worldwide.

Several recent news events illustrate the dramatic paradigm shift that third-party funding can bring even to complex commercial litigation, where the parties typically bear preemptive upfront costs just to determine the merits of mounting a case.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from