Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 SEPTEMBER 2025

Due Process: Barrier Or Bridge? Post-Vijay Karia Shifts In Section 48(1)(B) Enforcement And Global Benchmarks

S&A Law Offices
S&A Law Offices
Contributor
S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices is a full-service law firm headquartered in Delhi NCR. The firm has 300+...

View firm profile
Explore more from S&A Law Offices

Enforcing foreign arbitral awards in India is governed by Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act), which incorporates...

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

I. Introduction

Enforcing foreign arbitral awards in India is governed by Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act), which incorporates the pro-enforcement bias of the New York Convention. Under this framework, Indian Courts will enforce a foreign award unless the resisting party proves the existence of a limited ground for refusal under Section 48. One such ground – the focus of this article – is contained in Section 48(1)(b) of the Arbitration Act, which allows refusal if “the party against whom the award is invoked was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case.” This provision encapsulates the due process and natural justice requirement in international arbitration.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from