Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JUNE 2026

Why Diligencing Compliance Processes Is Critical In Defense And Dual-use Investments

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

Close interaction with governments and intermediaries places defense companies at heightened risk of bribery, corruption, and related financial crime.

GlobalCriminal Law

Close interaction with governments and intermediaries places defense companies at heightened risk of bribery, corruption, and related financial crime. Here we explain how investors must assess not only the existence of compliance frameworks, but whether they are effective in practice and aligned with evolving enforcement expectations.

Summary

Effective due diligence of defense targets requires assessing not only the existence but also the practical effectiveness of anti-bribery and anti-corruption (ABAC) frameworks, including strong controls over third parties and board-level governance.

Regulatory bodies like the UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) demand data-driven evidence that compliance systems are actively functioning, not just formally in place.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from