Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 OCTOBER 2026

Can A Disclosure On The Back Of The Package Save A Claim On The Front?

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

About Kelley Drye We’re focused—in key areas of the law and on the nuances of each matter—to help...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

When does a disclosure on the back of a package save a misleading claim on the front? A federal court's ruling in a class action against Barilla over its "Italy's #1 Brand of Pasta" slogan clarifies when disclosures on other panels can resolve ambiguous claims versus when front-panel statements are unambiguously deceptive.

GlobalConsumer Protection

We’ve posted about cases in which courts have ruled that a disclosure on the back panel of a package can’t save a misleading claim on the front panel. As the court in an earlier case put it: “You cannot take away in the back fine print what you gave on the front in large conspicuous print.” A recent decision involving Barilla’s long-running (and since retired) “Italy’s #1 Brand of Pasta” slogan shows the other side of that rule. 

Two California shoppers brought a class action against Barilla over its slogan, which appeared on the front of pasta boxes, flanked by the colors of the Italian flag. They said the label made them believe the pasta was made in Italy from Italian ingredients and bought it because of that. Apparently, they didn’t pay attention to a disclosure on the side of the boxes stating that the pasta was “Made in the U.S.A. with U.S.A. and imported ingredients.” 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from