Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JULY 2015

Antimonopoly Regulation Of Tenders In CIS

Dentons
Explore more from Dentons

The sale of goods and services through tenders has become normal practice for many companies operating in CIS markets.

GlobalAntitrust/Competition Law
Marat Mouradov
Marat Mouradov
Author LinkedIn connections

The sale of goods and services through tenders has become normal practice for many companies operating in CIS markets. The establishment and maintenance of transparent and honest conditions for bidding in tenders is one of the fundamental principles for developing competition on relevant markets. However, most CIS countries lack detailed antimonopoly regulation of tenders. This brochure provides more details on competition law and tenders' regulation.

The articles in this brochure have been prepared by DENTONS offices in various CIS countries, as well as our partner K&P Law Firm LLC (Armenia).

The brochure provides information on the following jurisdictions:

  • Russia
  • Kazakhstan

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Booking Holdings v. Commission: General Court Clears The Way For Reverse Leveraging

The General Court of the European Union has upheld the European Commission's prohibition of Booking Holdings' acquisition of eTraveli Group, endorsing for the first time a 'reverse leveraging' theory of harm in conglomerate mergers. This landmark judgment establishes that dominant companies can be blocked from acquiring complementary businesses even when the target operates in a market where the acquirer lacks dominance, fundamentally reshaping merger control enforcement in digital and ecosystem-driven mark
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Baker Botts L.L.P.
Baker Botts L.L.P.
Article

KKR Agrees To Historic $250 Million Penalty For Alleged Violations Of HSR...

The Department of Justice announced a landmark $250 million settlement with KKR & Co. for allegedly submitting deficient Hart-Scott-Rodino Act notification forms across at least 16 transactions. This unprecedented penalty, the largest ever for HSR violations, raises critical questions about merger notification compliance obligations and the consequences of systemic noncompliance with federal antitrust review requirements.
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Bracewell LLP
Bracewell LLP