Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 NOVEMBER 2026

Fixed-term Employment Under A Court Settlement

The Federal Labour Court has clarified the requirements for valid fixed-term employment agreements concluded through court settlements. The ruling examines when a court's involvement is sufficient to justify a fixed term, distinguishing between settlements where courts actively shape the content versus merely recording agreements already negotiated by the parties. The decision reinforces existing case law on protecting employee interests in settlement-based fixed terms.

GermanyEmployment and HR

In its judgment of 4 March 2026 (case no. 7 AZR 297/24), the Federal Labour Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht, BAG) made clear that a fixed term agreed in a court settlement is only valid if the court helped to shape what the settlement says. The decision confirms the BAG’s existing case law on fixed-term agreements in court settlements.

Facts

From September 2018, the claimant worked as a skilled worker at a nuclear power plant under a fixed-term employment contract. He brought a claim challenging the validity of that fixed term. At the conciliation hearing, the parties discussed a settlement but could not agree. They then continued negotiating through written submissions. In the end, they agreed that the employment relationship would end on 30 June 2023 under a further fixed term. Until then, the claimant would be released from work on full pay. The parties sent the settlement they had negotiated to the Labour Court as a joint proposal. By order of 27 October 2022, the court formally

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from