Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 JANUARY 2025

CD Paris, January 21, 2025, Decision On Validity, UPC_CFI_311/2023

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

In revocation actions, the claimant is required to specify the grounds of invalidity that allegedly affect the contested patent, as well as prior art documents relied upon to support any allegation...

FranceIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

A revocation claimant must present all grounds of invalidity with the Statement of Claim

In revocation actions, the claimant is required to specify the grounds of invalidity that allegedly affect the contested patent, as well as prior art documents relied upon to support any allegation of lack of novelty or inventive step in its statement of claim as this defines the subject matter of the dispute. New grounds of invalidity of the contested patet or new documents considered novelty destroying or affecting inventive step cannot be submitted in subsequent written act as this contradicts the principle of front-loaded proceedings.

Determination of a realistic starting point when assessing inventive step

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from