Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JUNE 2025

The UPC's Interpretation Of Inventive Step: Does It Follow The Problem-solution Approach?

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

UPC case law on the assessment of inventive step is still evolving. Most local division (LD) decisions have indicated...

European UnionIntellectual Property
UPC case law on the assessment of inventive step is still evolving. Most local division (LD) decisions have indicated a slightly diverging practice from the EPO's problem-solution approach. However, more recently, others have called for the UPC to follow strictly the EPO's approach for the sake of legal certainty and to align UPC and EPO case law. Until there is definitive guidance on this issue from the Court of Appeal, those involved in UPC nullity proceedings would be advised to assess inventive step both under the EPO and the UPC approaches.

NJOY Netherlands B.V. v. VMR Products LLC (UPC_CFI_311/2023, ORD_598528/2023), Paris Central Division—January 21, 2025

Background

Dutch e-cigarette manufacturer NJOY attacked a patent held by its competitor VMR Products, a subsidiary of Juul Labs. The challenged patent (EP 3 626 092, "EP'092") related to an electronic cigarette, which provides nicotine via a smokeless inhalation process. E-cigarettes typically

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from