Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 NOVEMBER 2024

T 1994/22 – Polymorphs And Plausibility

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

When prosecuting inventions pertaining to chemical subject-matter before the European Patent Office (EPO), it is often helpful to demonstrate that the claimed compounds...

European UnionIntellectual Property

When prosecuting inventions pertaining to chemical subject-matter before the European Patent Office (EPO), it is often helpful to demonstrate that the claimed compounds are improved relative to those in the prior art. The most convincing and successful way of doing so is to provide experimental data directly comparing the claimed compounds to those already known. However, using the EPO's preferred problem-solution approach, it is not uncommon for the closest prior art to have been unknown to the applicant at the time of filing. As such, the application as filed may not contain the necessary comparative data needed to demonstrate an improved and unexpected technical effect over the closest prior art.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from