Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2021

Registering Your "Distinctive" Sound Mark

Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Explore more from Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

In one of the latest cases, the European Court ruled about a sound mark making it one of the first instances after the reform of trademark law.

European UnionIntellectual Property

In one of the latest cases, the European Court ruled about a sound mark making it one of the first instances after the reform of trademark law. The European Court of Justice rules that the sound mark "tin plop" was devoid of distinctive character. While opening a beverage can, the sound "tin plop" is a common sound. The disputed sound mark of tin plop is also the similar sound of the opening of beverage can be followed by about one second of no sound and a tingling sound of about nine seconds. The application was filed by Ardagh Metal Beverage Holding GMbH & Co. (Germany). The applicant submitted an audio file of their sound mark "Dosen Plopp" consisting of sound and a deliberate silence which was filed in Class 6, 29, 30, 32, 33, etc. But the trademark office refused to register the same giving the reason of lack of distinctiveness. Distinctiveness was a basic requirement for a trademark which the sound mark lacked for a commercial origin.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from