Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JANUARY 2014

Possibility To Obtain SPCs Broadened By Three Eagerly Awaited CJ Decisions

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Contributor
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

Our clients are increasingly operating in South-East Asia and require legal assistance in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

On 12 December 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJ") handed down three important decisions regarding the interpretation of Regulation 469/2009 (the "SPC Regulation").

European UnionIntellectual Property

On 12 December 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJ") handed down three important decisions regarding the interpretation of Regulation 469/2009 (the "SPC Regulation"). These three decisions are expected to impact your SPC strategies.

In Actavis v Sanofi (C-443/12) and Georgetown II (C-484/12), the CJ clarified the circumstances in which Article 3(c) of the SPC Regulation may allow the granting of more than one supplementary protection certificate ("SPC") per basic patent. In Eli Lilly v HGS (C-493/12), the CJ sanctioned a broad interpretation of "protected by a basic patent in force" (3(a) SPC Regulation) which can also include functional claims.

Download

Please download the legal alert here in English.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from