Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MARCH 2021

Is Expert Evidence Always Necessary In Design Cases?

Rothy's Inc v Giesswein Walkwaren AG [2020] EWHC 3391 (IPEC) 16 December 2020...

European UnionIntellectual Property

Rothy's Inc v Giesswein Walkwaren AG [2020] EWHC 3391 (IPEC) 16 December 2020

In one of the last IP rulings before Brexit, the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (the IPEC) recently handed down its judgment in Rothy's Inc v Giesswein Walkwaren AG [2020] EWHC 3391 (IPEC) finding that Rothy's Inc's (the claimant) Registered Community  Design (RCD) in relation to a shoe depicting a Pointed Loafer was valid and infringed by Giesswein Walkwaren AG (the defendant).

The IPEC also found that an Unregistered Community Design (UCD) for the Pointed Loafer was valid but not infringed.

The court gave important observations relating to the necessity and appropriateness of evidence used by both parties. The IPEC "pointed" out that whilst expert evidence was not excluded, it was not given any weight in this trial in relation to issues reserved for determination by the court. Proportionality is the guiding principle since significant costs and time could have been saved.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from