Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JANUARY 2017

Genuine Use: Are Sales To End Consumers Necessary?

The General Court (GC) has confirmed that there is no 'end consumer' test for assessing genuine use, nor a need to have physically launched products in the marketplace.

European UnionIntellectual Property

The General Court (GC) has confirmed that there is no 'end consumer' test for assessing genuine use, nor a need to have physically launched products in the marketplace.

Proving use of a registered trade mark can often be difficult and onerous; however, the recent GC decision in Fruit of the Loom, Inc v EUIPO provides helpful guidance in determining whether use is genuine if it has not been made to the end consumer.

Background to Fruit of the Loom, Inc v EUIPO

Fruit of the Loom, Inc own a European Union Trade Mark (EUTM) for FRUIT in respect of 'clothing, footwear, headgear'. Takko Holding GmbH applied to cancel the registration on the grounds of non-use. Fruit of the Loom submitted evidence which included use of the word FRUIT as a stand alone element in preparatory works for the launch of a new clothing range, along with evidence that professionals within the retail sector had seen these preparatory works.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from