Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2023

EPO Decision Significantly Relaxes Patent Priority Approach

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

The European Patent Office's Enlarged Board of Appeal has issued a decision in the consolidated cases G 1/22 and G 2/22 on Oct. 10 that redefines the way that entitlement...

European UnionIntellectual Property

The European Patent Office's Enlarged Board of Appeal has issued a decision in the consolidated cases G 1/22 and G 2/22 on Oct. 10 that redefines the way that entitlement to priority is assessed at the EPO, significantly relaxing the previously strict approach.

This is a welcome development for many patent applicants and will make challenging the right to priority in post-grant opposition proceedings far more difficult.

However, applicants should still be mindful of the national law requirements in various contracting states of the European Patent Convention, or EPC, which may now be stricter than the EPO's more relaxed approach.

The Enlarged Board of Appeal's reasoning also leaves open questions as to the nature of the evidence that will be required to successfully challenge priority entitlement in disputes between co-owners of priority applications.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from